27 01 2006

there is a great discussion over at the connectivism blog about the terms  web 2.0, teaching 2.0, and learning 2.0.  in my mind, george siemens is one of the true though leaders in education today.  check connectivism out.  here is my two cents in the 2.0 discussion.

as a label and a concept web2.0 makes good sense to me.  one, it’s technology.  technology uses a versioning approach.  two, it’s a huge shift in technology that is happening and not just in the learning arena.

teaching 2.0 makes some sense, but i worry that too many instructors will cling to the old ways and methods til the bitter end.  some of those will give mouth service to web2.0 technologies (use a wiki to write your term paper, but make sure it’s no more than 20 pages long and double spaced when you turn it in.  doh!)  to me teaching 2.0 would include the abolition of linear term papers, team learning (including transuniversity even transnational teams) becoming superior to individual knowledge aggregation, plagerism disappearing as a concept (because citations would be in the metadata of the concepts), and student won’t gain admission to a school but will be awarded an apprenticeship with a department.  then you’re talking something equivalent to web2.0.

as for learning 2.0  i just think the term is so limiting in concept to what truly in happening.  are "new ways" of learning

being accepted more and more over the past few decades? you bet. but
learning styles research, gardiner’s work on multiple intelligences,
and similar efforts have not created new ways of learning. they’ve
merely liberated those styles of learning from a tyranny of the
dominant paradigm. a paradigm whose genesys is often associated with
aristotle and the greeks, given credence by aquinas and
institutionalized by the industrial revolution.

no wonder this emancipation seems like a shift worthy of the label of 2.0! 

one of the things that has appealed to me about web 2.0 is that it
seems we are actually beginning to align the tools we use to organize
our individual and group conceptualizations of the world to the way the
human mind works. the more we learn about what that amazing machine
between our ears does second to second, the more ridiculous our past
conceptualizations about learning sound. concepts which seemed cutting
edge just 20 years ago are, in reality, simple minded and limiting.
maybe the discomfort with the term learning 2.0 comes from the fact
that learning 2.0 happened a very long, long time ago but someone
misplaced the
owner’s manual.



One response

28 01 2006
El yaagoubi ahmed

Nous sommes un groupe de professeurs-formateurs qui concevons des projets en e.learning,en collaboration avec WebCT.
Nous travaillons sur le français et l’arabe,langues étrangères pour publics de profils et d’attentes diversifiés.
Nous cherchons parenaires financiers.
El yaagoubi ahmed
pseudo skype:yagamed987

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: